• FaceDeer@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I pointed out that several smart people were disagreeing with TootSweet. You responded:

    Big “100 physicists have signed a letter saying you’re wrong, Mr. Einstein” energy.

    Who else would “Einstein” be in this analogy?

    • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      Anyone. Show the proof that anyone is wrong. Linus Torvalds’ opinion isn’t proof of anything.

      The scientific method gives you a way to disprove the hypothesis and you can’t do it. The fact that some, or dozens, or hundreds of people disagree doesn’t disprove anything.

      Truth isn’t a democracy.

      Edit:

      The proof that Einstein was right wasn’t that his name was Albert and that he was respected by other physicists. Early on, he wasn’t respected by other physicists.

      What proved him right was the apparent position of Mercury near the sun, proving that gravity bent light, proving his theory of relativity.

      Newton’s laws of motion didn’t account for that. And that proved Newton wrong.

      • FaceDeer@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        When did I ever claim “proof” of anything, let alone with scientific rigor? Here was my original comment, verbatim:

        If everyone you thought was smart are disagreeing with you, perhaps take another look at your position on the matter? Might be a reason beyond spontaneous mass “psychosis.”

        This is advising uncertainty, not certainty. The opposite of what you appear to be accusing me of here.