From my view, all software is political in some sense. And if a software claims that isn’t political is a political statement in itself. And with the recent dubious statement from Linus in the Kernel of Linux. I think we should either think about it or discuss about it.

What is the political intention that is happening in this.

All feedback is welcomed.

    • Solumbran@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      That when you try to play the middle between the nazis and the victims of the nazis, you are just a nazi.

      When you are a fucker who says “the suffering and pain on both sides is a tragedy”, it’s like saying “the suffering on both the nazi side and the people the populations they were genociding during WWII is a tragedy”, that’s something only a nazi (and a cowardly one) would say.

      Is that what you were hoping for?

      • MangoCats@feddit.it
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        I thought you had more in you than that. Tepid repetition of the worn rhetoric. Try again.

        • Solumbran@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 days ago

          What is it, you just have nothing to say? You were hoping for an attack surface but didn’t find one?

              • MangoCats@feddit.it
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                3 days ago

                Well, I’m not trying to make you do anything, what you have voluntarily revealed is the most boring response possible, following the most common noise around the internet, swimming in the main stream, and acting a bit either defensive or passive aggressive offensive as if having a different opinion than what you posted is somehow an attackable offense.

                In short, you have offered nothing of interest, congratulations: you’re officially homogenized.

                • Solumbran@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  Well please share with us your extremely unique, interesting and enlightening opinion on Ed Sheeran then. Because you’re trying very hard to sound clever but you’re just saying meaningless sentences.

                  • MangoCats@feddit.it
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    My position is that “you’re with us, or you are against us” says nothing about me, only about your simplistic binary convictions.

                    I do not support Israel.

                    I do not condone violence against Palestine.

                    I do not condone the performance venue’s ownership/management stifling free speech among their performers, but then, neither should we stifle the venue ownership’s right to make an ass of themselves by doing things like they did.

                    I do not see a reason to villify Ed Sheeran, other than he’s a spineless wuss of a commercial sellout whose music I never particularly cared for, but that doesn’t mean he should be beat up for failing to make a stronger stand on this, or any, issue. He is entirely within his rights to be a waffly wuss. Just because he won’t go around throwing labels like Nazi, Fascist, Genocidal, etc. isn’t a reason to force him to make public statements one way or another. If his position is that he has no position, then that too is a position. Judge him as you will, but don’t put words in his, or anybody else’s mouth.