• Deacon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I guess Joplin or Branson would be the only other options, but I haven’t lived there in years.

    KCMO does not want to be in another state, because it is far, far superior - and older than its Kansas counterpart, which oddly enough is named after it.

    That’s right.

    Kansas City, KS is named after Kansas City, MO

    • Duranie@leminal.space
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      How about Springfield?

      My parents retired to the Ozarks 30ish years ago. Beautiful area, had a house built on the side off a mountain in the middle of nowhere (Cape Fair technically, but same difference.) I just remember Springfield being the closest city if you needed anything better than what the Walmart in Branson West could provide.

    • AppleTea@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      If you don’t mind me asking, whats that big, greener patch in the south east? Forest? Swamp?

    • thru_dangers_untold@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Yep. The Kansas River was originally named after the native Kansa (or Kaw) tribe. Then the city was named after the river. Then a while later, the state was also named after the river and the other city was named after the first city. Clear as the muddy river.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Branson is a shithole tourist trap that’s dead or dying.

      Joplin is famous for its tornado.

      those two aren’t doing Missouri any favors.