• REDACTED@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    Sponsored by…UNESDA. Literally the same association that fought for this in the first place. This helps my argument immensely.

    • Ghoelian@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      If they fought for this in the first place then why did they sponsor an article discrediting themselves?

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        Not everything works like Trump being unable to admit your mistakes. These organizations are commonly interested in improving EU, not purely selfish motives.

        • Jiral@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          10 hours ago

          I have no idea where you have the idea from that UNESDA was for tethered caps, at any point. You linked to an ad from UNESDA from before 2020 and quoted a contract PWC study from that time. All against it. Many of the assumptions in that study have become either obsolete or were shown to be wrong.