• pageflight@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Human review of AI is sufficient in theory, but in practice it’s never as thorough as the understanding you get writing it yourself. It’s hard to avoid AI, but it is a constant invitation to laziness.

    • [deleted]@piefed.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Unlike reviewing a human who writes code there is zero chance of AI learning from the past and making fewer mistakes in the future. At a least a human has a chance of becoming better at coding from review feedback.

      • BJW@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        No? Are you not aware of the concept of “memories”? AI do indeed take feedback into account, if they’re designed to.

        • [deleted]@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          7 hours ago

          AI does not have memories.

          It has a comparatively small context window that makes things worse the more it fills up.

          • architect@thelemmy.club
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            Eh I really think it does. You don’t news to load everything into context. You need to load where everything is located into context.

            • DaTingGoBrrr@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              7 hours ago

              They save some strings in a document to later read and “remember”. Calling them memories is a reach.

              • BJW@lemmus.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                My point stands that they can learn from feedback. Your memories are only information in a virtual document, too. Just as susceptible to corruption, or misinterpretation.

                  • BJW@lemmus.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    5 hours ago

                    Only because you don’t think of it as one. It’s just a different medium for the storage of information.

        • pageflight@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The auto-generated memories I’ve seen it create are pretty inane: “always name variables container_ when in MySpecificClass”. Not really learning engineering principles.

          Similar, I’ve found AGENT.md files might nudge it in the right direction, but as always it’s a fuzzy matcher, not a learning engineer.

          • BJW@lemmus.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            It’s best to generate memories manually, but I’ve had good fortune with auto-generated so far. At least using Co-pilot.

            I have found it best to have another AI generate the agent.md - having a layer of interpretation can really clarify the information imparted.