On machines where you start Steam manually in order to play a game, do you keep Steam running in the background after play session is over? Meaning if you no longer play any game for the moment, and just keep it running to be ready. Or do you close Steam, after the play session?

  • Björn@swg-empire.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I mostly use my Steam Controller to control my PC and the Steam keyboard is the best to use with the two touchpads.

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      That’s actually a good point. This is basically my biggest problem with the controller (not able to use it for everything, because i love it, and because I don’t run Steam all the time).

  • jtrek@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I manually start it when I want to play something.

    I shut down the computer when I’m done for a while. Like before bed, or if I’m leaving the house.

    But if I play a game and then spend some time on the computer doing something else, I don’t explicitly close steam.

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    4 hours ago

    I can’t believe so many people here autorun it.

    Steam is, objectively, a chonky boi. If I’m not actively using it, why would I want it slowing down what I am actually doing? What’s the upside?

    And to be specific, I’m not concerned with RAM usage personally, but interrupts, CPU, networking, vram…

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I can’t believe so many people here autorun it.

      Me too. I’m actually a bit shocked. The reason why I started this poll is, because I recently saw lot of YouTube people saying they always run it in the background (because of the defense about Steam starting slow, versus the new Epic Games launcher). So I was curious if that is a thing most do.

      Also one of the reasons I close it is, it somewhat interferes with gamepads I am using outside Steam. Just one of the reasons.

      • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        Also, privacy and security. It’s just good practice not to autorun anything unless you absolutely have to, especially something with as much exposed “area” as a popular client with so many features.


        I recently saw lot of YouTube people saying they always run it in the background (because of the defense about Steam starting slow, versus the new Epic Games launcher).

        This is a hot take, but I think the tendency to autorun Steam… familiarity?

        People like Steam. It’s positive. It’s “on their side” and known, and it auto runs by default, so they aren’t particularly inclined to change that.

        I could not care less about how I feel about Steam. I care about the resource utilization I measured and see with my two eyeballs, and I don’t like it one bit. Heck, I’d much rather it not run even while I’m gaming, if I can help it.

        • Chronographs@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          For me gaming is the only thing my computer does where the performance actually matters, in pretty much all other things I use it for the performance impact is imperceptible. The only time I might close it is if I was trying to run some benchmark or something.

          • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            14 minutes ago

            I don’t like the overhead games either, TBH. This is why I try to buy GoG absolutely wherever I can; no launcher, no DRM, no overhead.

            Unfortunately, a lot of games aren’t on GoG, or are even Steam-exclusive now…

        • joelfromaus@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I have to say finding someone calling a gaming PC a ‘custom Steam Machine’ is pretty funny. Finding someone who isn’t familiar with making a gaming PC (been a thing for at least 20 years) but is familiar with Steam Machines, originally announced 13 years ago but only really becoming a thing now.

          Takes all sorts of people haha

          • thingsiplay@lemmy.mlOP
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Whats so funny about it? If you have a PC and run Steam directly, even if its not SteamOS, it acts like a Steam Machine. That’s why I said “So basically”. I am also familiar with the original Steam Machines, but they were much different than what we have today. Why is it a thing now, and wasn’t a thing back then? Because it wasn’t ready back then. How many Linux only games did we have on Steam? There wasn’t a builtin Proton, and also Steam and the operating system itself wasn’t ready. Valve also didn’t make their own handheld and left the production to third parties, who made expensive PC hardware. There was no reason to buy them.

            • joelfromaus@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              25 minutes ago

              If you have a PC and run Steam directly, even if its not SteamOS, it acts like a Steam Machine.

              If someone has a phone with Facebook on it, is it a Facebook phone?

              My PC also has Firefox on it. Is it a Firefox Machine? But it also has Steam. Is it a Steamfox Machine? But what about all of the other applications? The name might get a bit unruly.

              You’ve got a bright future ahead of you, kid. Maybe ask an elder to pull out an old PC to muck around with, they’re actually very versatile pieces of hardware. Can code on them and everything.

  • Nicadimos@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    I auto start it and leave it running. I have lots of friends that will reach out on steam if we’re both online to play together. If I’m always offline because steam is off, I’ll miss games with friends.

  • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    On any machine that I’m regularly using steam I have it open on startup and never close it. The only exception is my laptop, but usually once it’s started I just leave it going until I reboot or the popups annoy me.

    • thingsiplay@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I suppose you don’t autostart it on your Laptop, because its main purpose is not to game on it and the implication of RAM usage is high enough to concern you. I assume, right? At least it would for me, if I had a Laptop.

      • fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Purely for the annoyance of the popups of X is playing a game or whatever. It’s also the laptop I (normally) do work on so I don’t the distraction.

        I’ve never once considered the ram usage of steam. Any machine where ram is a concern is probably not a machine I’d want to play games on.

        • thingsiplay@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Oh that. Well you can adjust the notifications for every type of notification in Steam. I also disabled the notification for friends coming on or playing a game. I find it annoying too.