I have seen LLMs used to karma farm in order to create sellable accounts, but this account is 12yo which I find more disturbing because it means it used to be a real person’s and is now being used for something else.
I have seen LLMs used to karma farm in order to create sellable accounts, but this account is 12yo which I find more disturbing because it means it used to be a real person’s and is now being used for something else.
Why should the content of an argument ever be secondary to its source, especially if and when it satisfies and fully addresses whatever its burden to address?
I agree people should not try to conflate content they wrote from content that was generated.
My larger argument is they shouldnt (even have to) try to obfuscate who wrote what and the fact something was AI-generated shouldnt be this Deus-Ex-Machina that instantly relieves the “Human” from having to satisfy whatever burden of proof that rightly belongs to them to argue their counter-case where that occurs
Its way too convenient to argue thre opponent is AI and therefore they deserve to be prima facie disregarded and you, the human opponent win cuz you’re “human”. The same way people moving get to operate large moving truck UHauls cuz of the qualification “ur moving”
I just dont buy that a priori argument. If you, the Human, are so intelligible and coherent relativr to the AI I shouldnt need you to point out whos who and for you to additionally try to pull rank and identify as human to afford you some charity in apprehension of your arguemnents
If everything you say is true and thoroughlu comprehensible and inherently more satisfying of whatever argument at issue it should be little challenge if your beliefs are actually true and you succeed in making that intelligible
To paraphrase Gabor Matte: Why the
PAINFEAR?