There is evidence, you just chose to ignore it. You want proof by pointing at instances in the final game, which will never exist, but the burden of proof rests on you just the same.
Can I ask you something else: Would you consider the hypothetical game “intact” if intrinsically planned queer content was removed from the game after a totally hypothetical request?
Actually, the same could not be said for Creamfresh. You’re the only one defending censorship and suppressing an entire group of people and using seemingly logical arguments in bad faith to make your appalling stance sound reasonable while dismissing any rightfully upset counterarguments. Grow up.
You don’t see the removal request as an indicator that there might have been similiar attempts during actual development?
deleted by creator
Of course I mean that request.
deleted by creator
You’re either dense or not acting in good faith.
deleted by creator
There is evidence, you just chose to ignore it. You want proof by pointing at instances in the final game, which will never exist, but the burden of proof rests on you just the same.
deleted by creator
Well, the game is canceled so are you done defending bigotry now?
Can I ask you something else: Would you consider the hypothetical game “intact” if intrinsically planned queer content was removed from the game after a totally hypothetical request?
Actually, the same could not be said for Creamfresh. You’re the only one defending censorship and suppressing an entire group of people and using seemingly logical arguments in bad faith to make your appalling stance sound reasonable while dismissing any rightfully upset counterarguments. Grow up.
“Seemingly logical” is generous here. @thingsiplay@lemmy.ml is hardly using logic or critical thinking.