A full strike directly impacts the public diminishing their support. It’s easier for citizens to support a fair-strike because it doesn’t impact their wallets. Not that they should - but some of the public will blame the drivers if transit just stops and they now can’t get to work.
Simply refusing to take fares while maintaining services directly impacts the transit company by maintaining operating costs and cutting off their income, while allowing the public to continue going about their day.
Leaving the busses in traffic just pisses everyone off and potentially bridges into personal liability for the drivers.
not if you’re blocking the suites exits and entries.
imagine the embarrassment it would form if the neighborhood knew the chief of the bus company fucked the city, and couldn’t travel.
A full strike directly impacts the public diminishing their support. It’s easier for citizens to support a fair-strike because it doesn’t impact their wallets. Not that they should - but some of the public will blame the drivers if transit just stops and they now can’t get to work.
Simply refusing to take fares while maintaining services directly impacts the transit company by maintaining operating costs and cutting off their income, while allowing the public to continue going about their day.
Leaving the busses in traffic just pisses everyone off and potentially bridges into personal liability for the drivers.
Plus they’ll just tow them out of the way.
not if you’re blocking the suites exits and entries.
imagine the embarrassment it would form if the neighborhood knew the chief of the bus company fucked the city, and couldn’t travel.