• DdCno1@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Publisher relations is another reason. I don’t think EA appreciates this.

    • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Been there too. I think it was Warner Brothers (at the time) that had a hissy fit about a review of a game. They didn’t like the review: they wanted advertising rather than editorial. We told them to talk to the sales department.

          • DdCno1@beehaw.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 hours ago

            Interesting. I actually remember this game very fondly. It’s a well made mid-budget game for kids, in my opinion. Nothing groundbreaking, but charming, atmospheric and with fun gameplay. I was young when it came out, definitely part of the target audience (despite not caring about Harry Potter), but even revisiting it as an adult, I still found it to be enjoyable. Reading the Wikipedia article, I’m actually surprised by how low its review scores are.

            How did your magazine cover it?

            • deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Pretty much what you said, but that’s from memory. The site and the review is long gone now.