I mean, he really should’ve ditched the evidence. Getting away with it is a lot better than not. I don’t think it’d take much speculation to get the correct answer as to why someone would shoot a health insurance exec, so no real need for the manifesto, either.
I mean, he really should’ve ditched the evidence. Getting away with it is a lot better than not. I don’t think it’d take much speculation to get the correct answer as to why someone would shoot a health insurance exec, so no real need for the manifesto, either.
dude that shit was all planted.
either he was trying to get caught, or it was wildly illegal parallel construction.
Then why did he plead guilty with a speech nearly identical to the manifesto instead of contesting the evidence?
assuming you believe a damn thing the courts say: I already answered that.