I’ve been looking at phones lately and I’ve seen this company called Enough from their YouTube kickstarter video. It’s them and SLEKE (maker of OdesseyOS) working on building a nice size phone. I’m thinking of supporting their kickstarter because I am tired of these humongous phablets, and I can’t stand on how they feel in my hand when holding them.

The phone has everything I want but I am really wondering if the bootloader will be unlockable.

—-———————————————————————————————————

Some important edits that should be added; (after looking on Enough’s website and kickstarter)

  1. No unlockable bootloader
  2. No sideloading
  3. On Enough’s website, storage is expandable by MicroSD or that same space is using a physical SIM card and you have the option for eSIM
  4. No headphone jack, but a USBC to 3.5mm converter is given if you do the kickstarter
  5. Stock android or OdessyOS only (from SLEKE); no flashing capabilities at all
  6. Replaceable battery
  7. Price of phone from kickstarter:
  8. Super Early bird price: $399 USD (sold out)
  9. Early bird: $449 USD
  10. Kickstarter special; $499 USD
  11. Retail price after campaign: $599 USD
  • defiance@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    1 day ago

    Their point is that “sideloading” is a PR framing device to relabel a complete reasonable action i.e. “to install any Software on your device” to something which is not intended, advised and should not be desired.

    Yes, the term “sideloading” is more distinct but it carries baggage

    • communism@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      24 hours ago

      You’re adding negative connotations to words that have none. That’s like saying that we should rename piracy to “downloading media from alternative sources” or whatever just because corpos are anti-piracy. We use these words because they are precise and concise. Big tech is anti those words. We are pro those words. The word itself is neutral. “Sideloading” is a meaningful category because big tech makes it so by forbidding it, or making users have to use workarounds to do them. “It’s not sideloading; it’s just installing apps onto the phone you own”—well, that would be lovely, but that’s not currently the case.

    • kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Sideloading has been a word for installing apps that aren’t from a store at least since I started using Android in early 2010. There was never any negative connotation, aside from the acknowledgment that you wouldn’t get automatic updates.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      I’m fully aware of what their point is. My point is it’s a senseless boogeyman distinction that someone made up about a word that precedes Google, and replaces it with a much longer phrase.

        • artyom@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          This device has banned sideloading installing an app. Wouldn’t go anywhere near it.

          Surely you can see how that wouldn’t have conveyed the message I was sending in my comment?

            • artyom@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              edit-2
              1 day ago

              And now we’re back to using an unnecessarily long phrase that can be replaced with a single word. That’s what words are for. And you’re now not only being dumb but also a jerk so you’re being blocked. 👋