• Omnipitaph@reddthat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This does not actually refute the claim that the fetus would be dead. I’m not actually sure if you’re contesting anything.

      • Omnipitaph@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Do you think women are conceiving intern minerals in their womb? What is this question xD I’m going to assume you’re having a laugh, because by every metric a fetus is alive. If those cells are multiplying, consuming various stuff to continue multiplying; the fetus is alive. If the fetus, removed from its source of food, dies; it must be alive. If you removed me from all sources of food, I too would die.

        If you have a compelling argument, I’d love to hear it though.

          • Ghoelian@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 hours ago

            Not separate, but it is a living thing. If you starved your hand off by constricting the blood flow, I don’t think anyone would question you when you say your hand is dead.

            Actually isn’t that literally called dying off in English?

            • rockerface🇺🇦@lemmy.cafe
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              I think we’re using 2 different meanings of “dead” here. There’s “dead” as in “dead tissue” and “dead” as in “corpse”. My point was that a fetus fits the first meaning of “dead”, but not the second. You can’t “kill” a fetus.