• rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    I agree completely. I’m not saying that it’s a good system I’m just trying to figure out how they were doing anything useful with a 50-cent charge for a tour.

    • Stovetop@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      23 days ago

      It’s only 50 cents if you’re looking at 10 other properties managed by the same service. In practice, it’s $5 if you were only looking to tour a single place.

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        23 days ago

        The problem I have with it is, if they’re trying to make money from it, the price is way too low. It’s not like a single unit is going to roll in the rent for a month in perspective visits. Letting a practically unvetted person remotely into an apartment that could steal things or hide out in a closet and rape someone… just the insurance to cover that alone would eat up a tremoundous amount of the fee. Cellular lockboxes are hundreds of dollars a piece.

        If it was about money, it would need to be $20 for a single tour on a grand scale to make fiscal sense.

        That’s why I think they’re just using it to harvest your data, that’s worth WAY more than $20 to them.

        • A Wild Mimic appears!@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          23 days ago

          It’s not only to harvest your data to sell, it’s also to know how high the initial rent can be set (before you even see a property). That’s called an unfair advantage.