• fubarx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Isn’t having an antenna that interferes with nearby civilians a big no-no? How is it that ARRL is advocating ‘stealth’ antennas? Isn’t that a little like AAA openly publishing ways to cheat on smog tests?

    Am I missing something?

    • besselj@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 days ago

      A lot of landlords and HOAs prohibit antennas primarily because they don’t like seeing them

    • vu2tum@mastodon.radio
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      @fubarx @cm0002 stealth antennas are ones which are not an eyesore to muggles.
      Its us hams who get interference from cheap electronics and yet we don’t ask anyone to stop generating RFI. We design filters, shift frequencies or go POTA/SOTA etc.
      In short, we are a decent bunch who just want to sit in a radio quiet zone and talk to other weirdoes across the planet!

      • fubarx@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Ah, gotcha! Less of circumventing rules and more being considerate. Calling it ‘stealth’ threw me. Thanks for the clarification.

    • AngryishHumanoid@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      6 days ago

      My understanding is that this is just making the physical antenna less visible, regardless of location or visual factors you are correct that it interfering with anything would be a major issue which needs to be resolved.