“Signal is being blocked in Venezuela and Russia. The app is a popular choice for encrypted messaging and people trying to avoid government censorship, and the blocks appear to be part of a crackdown on internal dissent in both countries…”

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      5 months ago

      The current president of Signal is also still happy to do interviews with US-defense-oriented think tanks like Lawfare.

      They probably still are funded by USIntel, considering how interested RFA was in pushing Signal in privacy-oriented spaces.

    • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 months ago

      Unrelated to what the previous person is saying (banned because it was used by dissidents), but still, we have the source code. If you’re arguing they are somehow accessing the data, what’s encrypted and what isn’t is known.

      • RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        5 months ago

        Signal knows who you are taking to. You can build a network of contacts based on that information. When you send messages your phone number is protected but your ip address is not, and the receivers phone number is not protected. So you can find two people chatting based on that information. The app automatically sends a delivery receipt when a message is received to the other user, exposing the senders phone number and IP address.

        However, opposition in the country is backed by western agencies and NGOs, and likely their primary means of communication is signal since it’s backed by western intelligence, meaning, western actors believe it to be safe from external interference.

        I’m not arguing that the west is reading messages. I’m arguing that they believe it’s a safe haven for their agents because they pay money to ensure it’s safe for their agents. If it wasn’t, they wouldn’t use it. Its the same reason why the intelligence community in the west is a large supporter of the tor network. They use it in the field and operate their own exit nodes to protect their operations.

        • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          That’s what you fail to understand. It’s open source, it has been audited. Venezuela and any other country can check and crack the encryption if has holes in it. The long first paragraph is something that’s not a secret, but widely known.

          You know what’s also safe? Encrypted emails. VPNs. Matrix.

          If you think this is a movement against foreign agents, you should think it’s useless too. For a sufficiently motivated agent, this will be trivial to overcome. For the general population? Not so much.

          Unless next all forms of private communication re forbidden, of curse. Surely what people on a privacy community advocate for.

            • fira959@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              5 months ago

              Funded by the US? Well thats the entire internet, including Tor, Linux and Matrix…

              Amazing how much BS is spread here

              The only relevant part is the client, which as always been open source.

              • The server is arguably more important, that is where the data and meta data itself are stored. Linux has never hid its source code for a year, and matrix can be self hosted.

                I mean if you want to trust a honey pot go right ahead

            • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              5 months ago

              Which ones? Signal? Likely. Secure mail and VPN? For sure. Can “foreign agents” use them? Certainly.

              Who will have a hard time to use them? General population. Signal is the privacy communication service with the lowest barrier to entry, in terms of cost and setup complexity. Not a tool for spies, but for average Joe.

              What service do you recommend BTW? That ensures government cannot snoop and prevents “foreign agents”. It seems that any privacy is a risk, so I’m curious what a privacy minded person thinks should be OK.

                • Railcar8095@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  5 months ago

                  Yeah, I don’t know. Do you? It’s a fair assumption they use email, right? And VPN is standard in most organizations. I never even mentioned the opposition. Dissidents can be non affiliated people, who is discontent with their government or feel oppressed.

                  Why is it relevant? I thought you were interested about foreign agents? Or is all the opposition foreign agents?

                  Please tell me, should it be possible to have privacy from the government in Venezuela? If so, how? If you only answer one thing, please do this one.

                  • RedWizard [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    4
                    ·
                    5 months ago

                    Lol do you know how to migrate a community off one platform to another? Its about disrupting comms, not stopping them. Regular people will find other ways to communicate, as they always have. They have lots of options, as you’ve pointed out. I have no failings in understanding here. I told you already, signal is secure. Its security is backed by it’s western intelligence financing. It has flaws in leaking meta data, just like matrix, proton mail, and any other means of encrypted communication tools. This move is to disrupt organized communication to make it disorganized.

                    No one needs to mention foreign agents. If you are able to observe and analyze the greater context for a given action you can arrive at an approximate rationale for the action. The west has a history of attempting to destabilize Venezuela, they back right wing dictators as successors, they regularly fund dissident groups who want nothing more then to violently take power in Venezuela.

                    Its clear that Venezuela is facing external pressure to dismantle their democracy, and are taking actions to disrupt those efforts.