Briar is a messaging app designed to be used by groups of people to allow for secure and censorship resistant communications.

This technically isn’t self hosted in the strictest sense but I think it is still relevant.

  • tuxec@infosec.pub
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    After a loot of research and testing different tools (Briar, Jami, Simplex, Session), I ended up using XMPP (Snikket). The call quality is good, has E2EE, Self-hosteable

    Edit: fixed a typo

    • lemonuri@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 hours ago

      I don’t know why this gets downvoted. Xmpp is my solution as well. Lightweight, selfhostable and federated, it’s just a great solution. Briar is good as well and probably one of the best solutions if your are an activist/journalist. But it will eat your battery as all p2p solutions will. Is you host your own xmpp server at home, that’s really as secure as it will get imho.

      • tuxec@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        56 minutes ago

        Yeah… I’m a bit surprised by the downvotes also. I just shared my experience without saying anything bad about any apps. Anybody is free try any tool they want until they find the one that fits their need. Thanks for the support 🤝

          • Leraje@piefed.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            Lack of audit is not great I agree. I can see from a basic web search that security is an issue but I’m not sure ‘nightmare’ is warranted. The lack of audit seems to be main focus of concern and I’d say thats a judgement call for each person depending on threat model. I was hoping for something more conclusive than that. Its certainly adequate for a more privacy-centric way of communicating than an app that doesn’t cater for Apple users at all.

            • Possibly linux@lemmy.zipOP
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              18 hours ago

              I’m never going to recommend something that I can’t get to work reliability. Also the lack of a security audit is a major deal breaker.

              Communications is one of those things that needs to be absolutely solid.

    • sexy_peach@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      2 days ago

      Not at all. You’re effectively using a messenger that can only receive messages when your phone has an internet connection because briar doesn’t have servers. Also the connections are made through the Tor network, which hides metadata

      • artyom@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        Briar does not require an internet connection. It can send messages over Bluetooth and WiFi.

      • Victor@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        a messenger that can only receive messages when your phone has an internet connection

        To be fair, that’s true for most messengers, even ones that do have servers.

        • IanTwenty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          2 days ago

          Messages are only sent when both online though, thet’s the bigger difference (unless using Briar Mailbox). Also it can send over wifi and bluetooth without internet connection i.e. no other devices involved.

          • Victor@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 days ago

            Messages are only sent when both online though

            That’s an entirely different thing, yes. 😄

            I’ve always wondered what the utility is in sending messages over Bluetooth. Exchanging data secretly and securely in person, I guess?

            • artyom@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              1 day ago

              Anytime you have bad/no cellular reception. Think being at a large event where the cell network is saturated, or in a rural area with no cell service.

              • Victor@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Right, but you have to be so close to each other for Bluetooth to work, so it seems very limited in utility. But of course, data exchange in person would be one thing.

                • artyom@piefed.social
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  Bluetooth has a pretty significant range, especially outdoors. So you might be watching something on the stage while a friend or family member is 300 feet away at a concession stand.

                • TheButtonJustSpins@infosec.pub
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 day ago

                  It transfers across other peers; you don’t have to have a direct connection to the recipient, just an eventual connection to them.

              • Victor@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                17 hours ago

                That’s brilliant use, I like it.

                So how does it work? Do you just need to “have Bluetooth turned on” and it reaches the recipient, or do you need to connect to each other somehow? Can this work for a group chat with a family, or colleagues on a conference trip perhaps?

                • bandwidthcrisis@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  You need to enable Bluetooth as a method of connection in the app settings (and can turn off wifi and data there).

                  The phones can be in airplane mode but with Bluetooth turned back on (as you would to use earbuds).

                  I don’t recall pairing the phones, but there is a “connect via Bluetooth” option on each chat that might be doing that automatically.

                  You link accounts to each other by scanning qr codes.

                  It does have a group chat but I haven’t used it, so I don’t know if that works with Bluetooth alone.

                  I just tried testing this with an old phone of mine, but can’t get it to work right now (maybe because it has Graphene os?), but I have actually used it on flights in the past.