Let’s see where this leads. They have not managed so far to get GNU/Hurd production ready in the 35 years it’s been in development.
Also the EU voted against chat control.
They did not. It was just removed from the agenda for now.
If you installed them using the official instructions then they are updated with the rest of the system, and modules are automatically compiled for all installed kernels.
No one else then the parties messaging can see that the communication even occurs.
That was my take on it at least. Manual way tends to sound to me the “if you really want to do this the hard way” option.
You should have a look at the official document about updating https://en.opensuse.org/SDB:System_upgrade.
Edit: The recommended way is the opensuse-migration-tool.
They said text stop but didn’t say where to.
Agreed.
You might want check your dns record
10.0.0.0/8 ip addresses are not publicly routable.
Welcome to the light side. I’m a happy Tumbleweed user for many years now. Love that Hitchhiker’s guide reference .
Domain registration information is public and accessible via whois. If your domain registrar has privacy services use them. They usually mean that instead of your name etc it will display the info of the privacy proxy.
The annoyance is no notifications
Not true. I have GrapheneOS with no Google blobs in a profile where I have Signal from play store (via Aurora) and notifications work perfectly. Signal itself will turn on the no google mode for notifications if not available.
Try Flatseal.
Arbitration typically tends not to be as neutral as a court. A court will always look how laws apply in a particular case. Arbitration may not do that. Arbitration takes power away from the consumer. Arbitration is not a court of law. It’s a dispute between an individual and a company. Don’t know how things are in Switzerland in this regard but I fear that it’s not as neutral as a court of law would be. Especially as the arbitrator is pre selected by the company.
Also in their TOS “No Class Arbitrations, Class Actions or Representative Actions.” i.e. if the company would screw over dozens of people they can only complain one by one even if they are all the same case. If a class action or class arbitration could occur the company screwing over dozens of people it could be viewed as a whole hence it might be determined that what they are doing is systematic, and if it would be in court it could be seen as illegal.
Disclaimer: I’m not a lawyer or any kind of legal expert.
In their TOS: “XVII. Dispute resolution by arbitration”
“Binding Arbitration. – you – waive your and NYM’s respective rights to have any and all Disputes arising from or related to these T&Cs resolved in a court.”
A big red flag.
Wiki at least says: “It has been under development since 1990 by the GNU Project of the Free Software Foundation”.