• Pechente@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    Meta is also planning to drop its native WhatsApp Windows app in favor of a web wrapper version soon, in what looks like a move to simplify WhatsApp development.

    So they are just going back to what they had before, probably to save money.

    But don’t they have AI now which makes development so much faster, easier and cheaper? It’s these things where you can see these companies are full of bullshit.

    • TeamAssimilation@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 days ago

      What? It feels like a web wrapper right now, I always thought it was an old backend because the web app had better functionality.

  • Raiderkev@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    3 days ago

    Desktop site is the only place I access messages. Get fucked Zuck I’m not putting your spyware on my phone. If that method ever goes away, I guess no more messages for me…

    • MagicShel@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I just flat out quit messenger when they made it app-only. I’m not installing that shit in my phone or my computer. Facebook on my phone is just the web app.

      Best part is no little red digits telling me I’m missing out on something (spam and shit I don’t care about 95% of the time). I check it when I think to. That’s once every few months which is about how often I’m interested in updates from people who aren’t in my life any more.

      I’d like to replace all of my apps with bookmarks eventually. No one needs that kind of data on me.

  • IndescribablySad@threads.net@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    4 days ago

    Considering the unrelenting data snatching capacity of the desktop app, there are only 3 plausible reasons Facebook, a company so maliciously money hungry that it might just prove the absence of god, would choose to deprecate it

    1: something is fundamentally wrong with the app and they feel they are liable for greater damages than their potential profits

    2: they’ve improved their data collection on browsers to the point that both methods are equally profitable

    3: they don’t believe they need the money. (This one sincerely terrifies me)

    • tyler@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago
      1. They’re losing money on those teams and simplifying their stack will allow them to reduce costs.
      • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 days ago

        and 5. They know that they’re not going to lose any meaningful number of users by getting rid of these apps that just cost them money needlessly

  • Ashtear@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    4 days ago

    Ugh, the only thing I hate more than a few people I regularly talk with still using Messenger is having to deal with the desktop client. Now this 🙄

    I moved to a web browser but I can’t even get push notifications working.

    • FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      4 days ago

      Ugh, the only thing I hate more than a few people I regularly talk with still using Messenger is having to deal with the desktop client. Now this 🙄

      Doesn’t this mean that you should be happy with this then? Since you hate the desktop client?