cross-posted from: https://ttrpg.network/post/27970929

Recently the server staff received an e-mail telling them to moderate the Discord server and the server chat on what they deem to be “appropriate.”

Below is a message from owner of the server.

Free Speech Under Attack

Dear friends, I don’t often post announcements of this sort, but I feel it’s very important for you all to know what’s currently going on.

From the very start, over 15 years ago, one of the key founding principles of MinecraftOnline has been free speech. What started out as an uncontroversal, common sense policy, has proved to be a cornerstone of this increasingly unique community. As time has passed and Western society has wavered back and forth in its political leanings, free speech has repeatedly come under attack for political reasons. It has now become common to see arrests for posts on social media in countries such as Britain and Germany, in the name of political control, which have overtaken the numbers even of traditionally totalitarian countries such as China and Russia - a truly dystopian nightmare for freedom of expression and personal liberty.

Throughout this decade and a half of change, MinecraftOnline has held steadfast to its libertarian principles, and remained an oasis of freedom and openness in an increasingly closed and controlled internet. That is, until now.

Microsoft, through their subsidiary Mojang, have issued an ultimatum to MinecraftOnline. We have been told to do away with our free speech policy (which long pre-dates Microsoft’s acquisition of Mojang), within 7 days, or face a a permanent block. If that happens, nobody will be able to play on MinecraftOnline again, and the 15-year history of this beloved server will come to a sudden and bitter end. The full email we have received today, signed facelessly only as “Mojang Enforcement”, is included below.

The email makes extremely vague claims about “harmful interactions” and “harmful comments”, and we are asking Microsoft to clarify what specific interactions and comments they consider harmful. In the meantime, please spread the word, share this info on social media. Defend free speech.

-SlowRiot

    • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      17 hours ago

      It’s inevitable. Microsoft didn’t give Notch a billion dollars because they thought they could improve the product for the users. They bought it because of the number of users. They saw a revenue stream that wouldn’t require very many resources to maintain and that they could also expand to multiple microsoft platforms and then lock behind a walled-garden to sell access as a service. Of course they wanted to confine the player population to servers that microsfot controlled. That is the only way they could ensure that any add-ons/mods/players etc were gated behind their own storefront.

      • Cantaloupe877@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Minecraft Java edition got 1.19.1 back in July of 2022 that enabled chat reporting, message signing and server wide bans. It was the turning point where Microsoft pulled trust and control away from its users and begun acting more like a middleman.

        • SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          With it being Java Edition still, all safety changes disappear the moment you run an offline server and host your own auth method.

  • wccrawford@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    1 day ago

    It sounds like Microsoft is being notified by its Minecraft players that toxic interactions are happening on MinecraftOnline’s server, and they’re taking action to reduce toxicity associated with their IP.

    It’s really hard for me to fault them for that. Especially since MinecraftOnline is using the the Minecraft trademark in a way that sounds official in the name. I’m surprised they didn’t put a stop to that as it is.

    • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      20 hours ago

      what toxic interactions? i only believe corporations when they show their work.

    • nfreak@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Yeah honestly. Fuck Microsoft and all that but this sounds like there’s a strong reason behind it, and the owner’s post about “free speech” and “totalitarian China” is a MAJOR red flag.

      • starblursd@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        1 day ago

        Right? I’m a bit jaded but when someone starts making the “they’re attacking free speech” argument it usually comes down to “wahhh they won’t let us say slurs on Minecraft anymore” it sounds like users of the server are reporting toxic behaviors and the owner knows exactly what they mean.

        • GregorGizeh@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          23 hours ago

          Fair, but the point is valid even if we do not like the behavior they might exhibit on that server. It is their server, ran on their hardware. They should absolutely be able to swear and curse and be general dicks on their own server.

          In my opinion the issue is more that the name seems very official and might be misleading to players. They should make them change it and perhaps delist them from their official server finding tools, assuming those exist (have never really clicked with minecraft myself, though i do love me some space engineers)

            • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              17 hours ago

              An Ex-post facto EULA. Because whatever dumbshit Microsoft acquisition EULA that bootlickers like you want to point to in order to justify censorship 100% didn’t exist beforehand. But beside all that if I’m running it on my computer, your EULA doesn’t matter anymore at all.

    • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      21 hours ago

      Hahahaha, they violated that well over a decade ago. It was supposed to give acceas to all future releases at one point, which died the moment it released on consoles. iirc people were pretty upset about it way back when.

      Unfortunately the actual text of the alpha license terms appear to be lost to time, but you can find a number of posts online claiming the same thing, that it was worded in a way to indicate the license covered all future versions (across all systems), not just all future updates of java (and bedrock if you converted your account early enough).

      • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        While that may be true, that fact is immaterial. Microsoft can control which servers can exist, and thus they can and will do anything they want. The only way around them is to mod the game so that it’s more like a Terraria model, where anyone can run a server and anyone can connect to it.

        • randomname@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 hour ago

          this is already how it works for the most part, they just have Microsoft acting as a middle-man for player accounts as a form of DRM. you can remove microsoft from the equation entirely by using “offline mode” which also allowed cracked players to join.