• 5too@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    2 days ago

    It really doesn’t. I’m sure that satisfaction exists, but when your pay doesn’t always let you eat, it’s hard to stay put for the satisfaction.

        • ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          I understand that once a person has started a career, switching to a totally different career comes at a high price, so I suppose that instead I should ask “Why do you think that a person would choose to become a teacher, if he didn’t expect the satisfaction of teaching to make up for the relatively low pay?” The pay isn’t a secret and teaching generally requires a college education, which implies the opportunity to pick a different major and then start a different career.

          I knew a woman from a poor background who was the first person in her family to go to college. She chose a major in English and a minor in Women’s Studies. I’m not saying that English majors can never get well-paying jobs, but I come from a “you can pick any career you want - doctor or lawyer” background so I was very surprised by her decision. Why would a person who didn’t have any money pick to study something that isn’t great for earning money? But she wasn’t stupid - she really liked English literature… Maybe she ended up working as a teacher.

          • mushroomman_toad@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            20 hours ago

            I mean even from a pure market-based perspective, there is currently a teacher shortage and class sizes are too big, therefore we should pay teachers more to move up the supply curve. But also labor is not a textbook supply-demand curve anyways and is inelastic.

          • ayyy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            Because we force people to decide their life’s career track at age 17, before the brain is finished developing and you don’t know shit about self-sufficiency and careers and money.

          • Ryanmiller70@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            1 day ago

            A lot of people tend to want to study things they’re interested in, even if it doesn’t lead to a high paying job. You said yourself she was interested in English literature so that’s why she went with that as her major. It’s also a lot easier to learn and study something you actually care about than something you find boring or are just doing it to get paid. Like if I went to college, I’d find film studies classes or possibly some math ones way more for me cause I like that stuff, but if you tried to force me to take classes to become a doctor, lawyer, or trade school I’d flunk out hard and/or struggle to even get a passing grade.