Stamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to RPGMemes @ttrpg.network · 2 个月前[TallFrodo] TASTE MY STEELlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square28fedilinkarrow-up1364
arrow-up1364image[TallFrodo] TASTE MY STEELlemmy.dbzer0.comStamets@lemmy.dbzer0.com to RPGMemes @ttrpg.network · 2 个月前message-square28fedilink
minus-squareTheGreatDarkness@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkarrow-up4·2 个月前In 2e Pathfinder, yes. In 1e…no because 1e is just D&D 3.5 with a paintjob and there Fighter SUUUUCKED.
minus-squareentropicdrift@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 个月前Meh, Great Cleave combined with improved critical and some other stuff could lead to some crazy slot machine combo turns
minus-squareTheGreatDarkness@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 个月前And then you could get them on a caster and they would do it much better.
minus-squareorenj@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·2 个月前nah, you must not’ve stuck around for the patches. They ruled by the end of PF1e’s lifecycle. You could make some pretty awesome fighters with the actual class features they got access to.
minus-squareTheGreatDarkness@ttrpg.networklinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 个月前Well, running PF1 put me off RPGs for nearly a decade because I hated that system so much, so probably.
In 2e Pathfinder, yes. In 1e…no because 1e is just D&D 3.5 with a paintjob and there Fighter SUUUUCKED.
Meh, Great Cleave combined with improved critical and some other stuff could lead to some crazy slot machine combo turns
And then you could get them on a caster and they would do it much better.
nah, you must not’ve stuck around for the patches. They ruled by the end of PF1e’s lifecycle. You could make some pretty awesome fighters with the actual class features they got access to.
Well, running PF1 put me off RPGs for nearly a decade because I hated that system so much, so probably.