solarpunk.rizz.pill@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 day agoBro might be needing a neuralink frfrlemmy.mlimagemessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up1110
arrow-up1110imageBro might be needing a neuralink frfrlemmy.mlsolarpunk.rizz.pill@slrpnk.net to Memes@lemmy.mlEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square30fedilink
minus-squarepurplemonkeymad@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up16·18 hours agoThat’s watts multiplied by time, aka energy.
minus-squareTomtits@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·18 hours agoSo if you can have a kilowatt per hour, then why can’t you have a gigawatt per year?
minus-squareTaTTe@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up14·17 hours agoBecause it’s not kilowatt per hour (kW/h), it’s kilowatt hours (kWh). It would be fine to say GW years, but then the question would be over how long? Most likely one year, which gives us GWy/y = GW.
minus-squareSaymaz@lemmygrad.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up4·16 hours agoKilowatt per hour is not energy. It’s just power generated per hour. Energy would be kilowatt × hour.
That’s watts multiplied by time, aka energy.
So if you can have a kilowatt per hour, then why can’t you have a gigawatt per year?
Because it’s not kilowatt per hour (kW/h), it’s kilowatt hours (kWh). It would be fine to say GW years, but then the question would be over how long? Most likely one year, which gives us GWy/y = GW.
Kilowatt per hour is not energy. It’s just power generated per hour. Energy would be kilowatt × hour.
deleted by creator