Is Automated Enforcement Making U.S. Cities Safer or Just Raising Revenue? — Streetsblog USA

usa.streetsblog.org

Is Automated Enforcement Making U.S. Cities Safer or Just Raising Revenue? — Streetsblog USA

usa.streetsblog.org

nix@midwest.social to

Solarpunk Urbanism@slrpnk.netEnglish · 8 months ago

Cities should treat automated enforcement as a temporary tool as they build out holistically safe places. We can't punish our way to safe streets.

You must log in or register to comment.

Chat

Solarpunk Urbanism@slrpnk.net

urbanism@slrpnk.net

Create a post

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !urbanism@slrpnk.net

A community to discuss solarpunk and other new and alternative urbanisms that seek to break away from our currently ecologically destructive urbanisms.

Henri Lefebvre, The Right to the City — In brief, the right to the city is the right to the production of a city. The labor of a worker is the source of most of the value of a commodity that is expropriated by the owner. The worker, therefore, has a right to benefit from that value denied to them. In the same way, the urban citizen produces and reproduces the city through their own daily actions. However, the the city is expropriated from the urbanite by the rich and the state. The right to the city is therefore the right to appropriate the city by and for those who make and remake it.

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

21 users / day
21 users / week
21 users / month
21 users / 6 months
0 local subscribers
1.56K subscribers
50 Posts
0 Comments
Modlog