• melroy@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    37
    ·
    1 day ago

    I will move to Linux phone if chat control is enforced. Chat control violates all existing privacy regulations. It’s insane.

    • it_depends_man@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      23 hours ago

      That won’t work in the sense on page 35, Article 2 definition (f) it says that this applies to

          (ii)an interpersonal communications service;
          (iv) an internet access service;
      

      as well, meaning your phone provider and ISP. It’s highly the approach to enforce this would couple e-SIM and some app on your phone or computer that things have to be routed through. Or you just don’t get cell/internet service.

      • eleitl@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        21 hours ago

        This has not yet happened even in the most authoritarian jurisdictions, with the possible exception of North Korea. The Internet is built with open protocols so any restrictions will have to be implemented on the network edge. There is no vendor locking for on-prem routers in multiple countries. As long as all purpose computers are not illegal you can still use strong encryption and anonymizing services on your end devices on your own network. So any mandatory surveillance and tracking will have no power there.

        • it_depends_man@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I would be happy to be wrong.

          The entire “proposal” is absolutely crazy from start to finish anyway. It’s just that these companies will have to do ______ or be labeled or held liable for aiding in the distribution of CP.

          Who knows what they will come up with.

      • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Such a tech restriction would instantly kill hotspot capability of a phone. Not that I think they corrupt traitors in the EU wouldn’t want to try it anyways.

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      You’re lucky if you don’t depend on apps such as banking apps or Ryanair digital boarding passes

      • ftbd@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        That’s one of the major restrictions for casual use, yes. But if these measures are actually implemented, it might be worth it to have a second phone (or some other device) just for online banking

      • docus@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        23 hours ago

        We’re going to need a sanctioned phone just for banking and another one for everything else. Plus maybe a third one to take to demonstrations etc. Just great :(

        • eleitl@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Do not take a mobile device on demonstrations if you can’t verify it respects airplane mode. E.g. GOS does, but I’m not aware of any other such.

      • eleitl@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        21 hours ago

        I use hardware TAN generators but my bank’s app works on LineageOS and GrapheneOS. If my travel service doesn’t accept printed out documents then it is not a travel service I will use.

      • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        22 hours ago

        That is a problem for future Melroy. Hopefully some apps can just be used in a web app, so just going to their website.

        I also read about android virtualization within a container. Basically allowing you to still run android apps but we will see…