bubblybubbles@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 3 days agoLiberals : REEEEEEEEElemmy.mlimagemessage-square34fedilinkarrow-up171
arrow-up171imageLiberals : REEEEEEEEElemmy.mlbubblybubbles@lemmy.ml to Memes@lemmy.ml · 3 days agomessage-square34fedilink
minus-squarebalance8873@lemmy.myserv.onelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-21 day agoBut don’t you define lackeys as being people who also say china isn’t trustworthy? Ie it’s a circular logic you seem to got there, based on past ml experiences.
minus-squareAmnesigenic@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up6·1 day agoIt would only be circular if their agreement on China was the sole indication of their subservience to US interests, that is not the case
minus-squareEmpathy [he/him]@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 day agowhat are some of the other indicators?
The US and our lackeys, yes
But don’t you define lackeys as being people who also say china isn’t trustworthy? Ie it’s a circular logic you seem to got there, based on past ml experiences.
It would only be circular if their agreement on China was the sole indication of their subservience to US interests, that is not the case
what are some of the other indicators?
US military bases
Who are those lackeys?