May be a mean sounding question, but I’m genuinely wondering why people would choose Arch/Endevour/whatever (NOT on steam hardware) over another all-in-one distro related to Fedora or Ubuntu. Is it shown that there are significant performance benefits to installing daemons and utilities à la carte? Is there something else I’m missing? Is it because arch users are enthusiasts that enjoy trying to optimize their system?

  • windpunch@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    My main reason is, it’s not a dependengy hell. If I want to build software, I don’t have to go through 5 iterations of being told something is missing, figuring out what that is (most annoying part), installing that and retrying. On Arch-based distros, it’s 2 or less, if it even happens.

    Also, AUR.

    Other points include

    • Small install (I use archinstall though, because more convenient.)
    • rolling release.
    • Arch wiki

    My installs never broke either, so it doesn’t feel unstable to me.


    I like it more than ther distros because

    • Debian is a dependency hell, otherwise fine. Older packages. I still use raspian though.
    • Fedora has too much defaults that differ from my preferences. I don’t want btrfs, I don’t want a seperate home partition, dnf is the only package manager that selects No by default. dnf is also the slowest package manager I’ve seen. Always needs several seconds between steps for seemingly no reason at all. Feels like you can watch it thinking “Okay, so I’ve downloaded all these packages, so they are on the disk. That means - let’s slow down here and get this right - that means, I should install what I downloaded, right. Okay that makes sense, so let’s do that. Here we go installing after downloading”. I also got into dependency hell when trying something once, which having to use dnf makes it even worse. - I guess you can tell I don’t like Fedora.
    • Love the concept of NixOS, don’t like the lack of documentation
    • non_burglar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago
      • Debian is a dependency hell, otherwise fine.

      I agree on the older packages (I don’t need cutting edge), but what do mean about “dependency hell”?

      Side note, I laughed a bit at this, I haven’t heard the term “dependency hell” since the old rpm editor hat days before yum.