• YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    Hardly. And why not? Why do you seek to repress what I chose to mention online? Like it or otherwise, the vast majority majority of folk don’t have to go far to ‘discover’ their gender.

    I have no interest in the relentless naval gazing regarding gender that disproportionately dominates online conversations, likely perpetuated by bad actors trying to push a niche issue into the mainstream to further splinter the left, but to my mind pushing a collective that removes gender from people until they decide at some arbitrary age what they want to be is not the change most people want.

    • pelican476@discuss.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      You’re not a cryptofacist, you’re a socialist. A socialist who spends his time arguing online about concept of transgender people. Seems legit.

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      You’re not being pushed towards anything by me. Normalising safe practices is not the same as making it required law

      I am merely pointing out that in most contexts people don’t require that information and the less information about your kids is out there the safer they are.

      I know that gender has been made political, but it shouldn’t be. Frankly its dumb that people care so much for something that is rarely relevant outside the bedroom.

      • YeahIgotskills2@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Fair enough, perhaps I overreacted. I’m not particularly concerned that mentioning the gender or number of sprogs I have as part of a broader conversation poses a risk as such, but I take your point.