• missingno@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        The only actual quote here is

        Price point was secondary and painful. But that was pretty clearly a critical aspect to it.

        But Newell didn’t actually say it was at a loss, did he? Seems like they’re just speculating.

        • myspecialpurpose@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          20 hours ago

          You picked one quote out of both those articles to interpret as your counter to my point? Seems to me this isn’t even an argument. It’s a consensus among anyone that understands the cost of building that device. Amazing that your response to me providing sources is “But the owner didn’t say it explicitly, so it doesn’t count.” Are you 12 years old? Why don’t you provide some sources about how profitable the steam deck was?

          • missingno@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            19 hours ago

            I picked the quote that’s actually attributed to Gabe. The second link you gave doesn’t even have any quotes at all.

            It doesn’t sound like Valve actually did confirm this, but that some news outlets ran with a rumor.

            • myspecialpurpose@lemmy.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              18 hours ago

              Hey if you wanna interpret Gabe’s quotes of aggressive and painful pricing as something other than a loss or close to a loss as I said in my comment, while ignoring the theoretical cost of building a device like that, and the precedent set by so many other companies trying to break into a market like that, there’s nothing else I can say to get you off “winning” this argument. So yeah, I’m sure you’re right. I’m sure Valve is just banking on a bunch of existing steam users to want to buy a $700–$800 mid range box so they don’t have to move their PC into their living room to game on the couch. Solid business model.

              • missingno@fedia.io
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                18 hours ago

                That could just as easily mean the profit margins were thin, not necessarily negative. I asked if there was actual confirmation that it’s being sold at a loss, because all I could find was speculation, and you gave me speculation.

                • myspecialpurpose@lemmy.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  I said loss or near loss if you want to be pedantic about it instead of addressing the evidence that they didn’t make money on steam deck hardware in order to increase user base, which was the point of my comment in hopes that they would do the same for the console.

                  • missingno@fedia.io
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    18 hours ago

                    This conversation started with you saying you expected Valve to sell the Machine at a loss, me explaining why that’s unlikely, followed by you saying the Deck was definitely sold at a loss. You can’t backpedal that to near loss now.