Bazzite comes ready to rock with Steam and Lutris pre-installed, HDR support, BORE CPU scheduler for smooth and responsive gameplay, and numerous community-developed tools for your gaming needs.

  • poki@discuss.online
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    4 months ago

    I can’t fully agree with you about the smooth user experience on this particular distro because it’s immutable

    Could you elaborate on why you think this is the case? FYI, I’ve been using Fedora Atomic for over two years. So, please don’t feel the need to explain me how it works*.

      • poki@discuss.online
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Thank you for the reply!

        Inconvenient package management

        Fair.

        manual theme installation

        I assume this is based on an experience with Kinoite? Am I right?

        anything that involves changes to the system

        I’d argue “anything” is too harsh. But yes, there are definitely edge cases that are either very/too cumbersome or outright impossible to achieve on Fedora Atomic.

        However, I’d argue that while the associated paradigm shift and learning curve do require some commitment to adjust to, it is a more sane way of running a system for most people.

        • Martin@discuss.tchncs.deOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          This comment shows why I like Lemmy more than Reddit. Nuanced, acknowledging when the other person has a point without just yelling at each other.

          • poki@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            Hehe. I agree that the community on Lemmy gives off more mature vibes. I suppose one should at least credit them for being idealistic enough to be on Lemmy rather than Reddit.

            Thank you for spreading the positivity 😄!

        • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago
          Inconvenient package management
          

          Fair.

          If there’s a flatpak, no problem.

          Once you realize you do package management in distroboxes rather than the main OS (rpm-ostree etc), no problem, plus you have the AUR at your disposal.

          So Ima go not fair, although there is something of an education gap atm.

          • poki@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            I’m a big fan of Fedora Atomic. However, even I have to admit that knowing how to install packages through dnf is simply more convenient than knowing and understanding the nuances between rpm-ostree, Toolbx/Distrobox and flatpak. And I haven’t even delved into ujust and brew that are found on uBlue images.

            Furthermore, even if we would limit ourselves with what Fedora Atomic prescribes, we see the following inconveniences:

            • rpm-ostree ; I know --apply-live exists and I know systemctl soft-reboot exists. But still, if you have to resort to rpm-ostree, then both the speed of update/installation as well as the need to reboot (or live on the edge with --apply-live) are inconvenient compared to dnf.
            • flatpak ; It’s inconvenient that I have to alias the installed package if I prefer sane naming conventions when accessing it through the terminal. Furthermore, stuff like the NativeMessaging portal not being available yet for sandboxed browsers and how that prevents any local password manager to interact with them (without hacking your way through; which, once again, is an inconvenience) is inconvenient.
            • Toolbx/Distrobox ; the fact that you’d have to setup quadlets (or simply rely on uBlue images to do it for you) to keep them up to date, up and running is an inconvenience. The fact that distrobox-export has to be resorted to for accessing these directly from your ‘App Drawer’ is an inconvenience.

            The fact that there’s no centralized place for upgrading all of the above (unless you rely on an uBlue image) is an inconvenience.

            I could go on and on, but these should satisfy in revealing some of the more obnoxious inconveniences.

          • poki@discuss.online
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            Fair.

            Btw, was I correct on the following?

            I assume this is based on an experience with Kinoite? Am I right?

            • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              Yeah, I had that at the beginning, then added to my fstab

              # enable sddm and therefore good themes
              /var/sddm /usr/share/sddm none rbind 0 0
              

              and then it works, kludgy, but sddm is apparently working on allowing themes in /etc, sometime soon.

              • poki@discuss.online
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                Thanks for pointing that out!

                Bazzite also includes an entry in their documentation in which they explain how theming on Bazzite works exactly.

            • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              4 months ago

              No. I know that installing a GTK theme requires putting the files in /usr/share/themes that is not in /home. That’s why I said it. As an advanced user I love customization and freedom so immutable distros are a no go for me (and for many people imo). I didn’t even bother trying.

              • poki@discuss.online
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                4 months ago

                FWIW, by creating your own images (through BlueBuild or tooling offered by uBlue) you could bake themes directly into those folders.

                However, I totally understand why you’d not feel compelled to do as such 😅. Especially if your current distro/system works splendidly.

                Sometimes, placing it to ~/.local/share/themes works as well*.

                • barsquid@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  Thank you for sharing those links, I have been struggling with making rpm-ostree compose go from a yaml to an ISO, these look like they might reduce the level of effort!

                  • poki@discuss.online
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    You’re welcome!

                    FWIW, last year, through what became BlueBuild eventually, I had my own image with all kinds of modifications within a weekend. And, perhaps most curiously, I was a total noob when it comes to containerfiles, github, git etcetera. So, if I somehow managed, then you should definitely be fine.

                    Wish ya good luck! Consider reporting back 😉.

                • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  However, I totally understand why you’d not feel compelled to do as such 😅. Especially if your current distro/system works splendidly.

                  This.

                  Sometimes, placing it to ~/.local/share/themes works as well*.

                  Ehh I prefer system-wide installation. I think it’s a habit from times when installing an Android app with root (so the OS treats it as a system app) increased its performance.

              • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                4 months ago

                Yeah, I had that at the beginning, then added to my fstab

                #enable sddm and therefore good themes
                /var/sddm /usr/share/sddm none rbind 0 0
                
                

                and KDE themes with sddm components install fine now (most themes install fine into /home, does Gnome really not have per user themes?)

                Essentially you can tactically make things mutable as needed, use sparingly, but maybe not even trying lessens your opinion, no?

                • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  4 months ago

                  Why would I use a system that isn’t supposed to change if I want to change it? It’s just not for me and I don’t want to waste my time reinstalling everything. And my opinion isn’t completely proven without trying but I have theoretical knowledge.

                  • MalReynolds@slrpnk.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    0
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    Why would I use a system that isn’t supposed to change if I want to change it?

                    There’s a bunch of benefits, atomic updates, intrinsic rollback, security of immutability, safe automatic updating and it goes on. Some things are not quite ready yet, e.g. things like sddm which should probably install themes to /etc (which they’re working on), so as often happens in linux, workarounds ensue. Making one directory mutable does not destroy all the benefits.

      • Kusimulkku@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        4 months ago

        Inconvenient package management

        Can’t you just use the Gnome App Store or whatever it’s called?

        • GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          4 months ago

          GNOME Software but it only has Flatpaks which my machine can’t quite run smoothly. It’s weird that I use the GNOME ecosystem without Flatpaks though. Anyways I just use the AUR on my system that’s based on Arch btw.