Cipherd@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agofunctionslemmy.mlimagemessage-square119fedilinkarrow-up1666file-textcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
arrow-up1666imagefunctionslemmy.mlCipherd@lemmy.ml to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 1 year agomessage-square119fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: programmerhumor@lemmy.ml
minus-squaremarcos@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoThe examples on the meme don’t bind any variables. If those are lambdas, the Haskell version is just the ... part.
minus-squareidunnololz@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agoI mean if we are talking lambdas the kotlin would just be {}
minus-squareandrybak@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 year agotoo bad they chose :: for type declaration instead of :
Meanwhile Haskell:
=
\x -> …
The examples on the meme don’t bind any variables. If those are lambdas, the Haskell version is just the
...part.I mean if we are talking lambdas the kotlin would just be {}
too bad they chose
::for type declaration instead of: