Valve tells Ars its “trying to unblock” limits caused by open source driver issues.

  • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    17 hours ago

    the problem is although its a pc, valve wants it to sort of appeal to console users. and the problem is that the HDMI forum members are also TV manufacturers. they are very unlikely to ever support displayport.

    as long as TVs are more popular than monitors, that trend of HDMI holding control will never cease.

    • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Except there is no reason to ever put hdmi on the hardware. Displayport is superior to hdmi in every way, and when you need to step down to peasant land… a simple passive DP to hdmi cable/adapter will do the job. To even drive the point how shit hdmi is, you cant use a passive adapter from hdmi to dp, you’ll need a very expensive active adapter to do it.

      • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        there is, HDMI Arc, which is why all the home theater companies do not want to weaken its hold.

        Its a collaboration of tv manufacturers, home audio and the movie productions who want to keep HDMI propietary as fuck, to prevent piracy and to make their theater setup locked to themselves.

        • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          There is no technical reason DP doesnt have ARC. Its more of the industry is strangled by the HDMI forum. So you’ll never find an AV receiver with DP… thus no reasons for vesa to waste bandwidth for a feature that the industry will never adopt.

          • Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            hence, nothing will happen, unless monitors get more popular than TVs. because tvs are the majority bought display device period. The reason is because more people are willing to both spend more on tvs, and often are more willing to replace them, while people who use monitors hold onto them for extended periods of time. Thats why monitor tech is always a step behind both mobile and TV when it comes to the screen quality (e.g Monitors didn’t get OLED till LG released its gen 2 WOLED, and Samsung decided to drop QDOLED gen 1, while phones of course had oled/amoled for a long time, and OLED tvs have existed for years before it touched hte monitor space)

            Yes, theres no technial reason why display port CANT do it, but the problem is HDMI forum has the market. the market doesnt suddenly shift unless you give it a good reason to, which would basically require the VESA foundation producing a featureset so significantly better than HDMI, that it invalidates TVs to the consumer mind.

        • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          They can just bundle them? It still be cheaper than paying for the licensing. What is the issue here?

          • ramble81@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            8 hours ago

            It still be cheaper than paying for the licensing.

            Except it’s not. HDMI licensing (for high volume) is a $10,000 flat fee, plus $0.04 per unit if you use HDCP. So if you were to sell 100,000 units that would be $14,000 ($10K base plus $0.04 x 100K).

            Based on those numbers you would have to find a way to include a physical adapter for $0.14/unit. I don’t think you’re gonna find anything that cheap with any amount of quality.

          • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I don’t think it’s the best user experience when you get a new product neither do I think they are foolproof.

            • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              13 hours ago

              I mean… if someone can’t figure out which end goes where. Theres gonna struggle with a standard hdmi cable. I guess they could custom print big text on the cable ends to make it clear which end goes where. They’ll certainly have the volume to make such customization.

              • dogs0n@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                13 hours ago

                I think it’s more of the hassle side of things, added complexity (even if small) and it makes the product feel less refined/premium/sleek in my opinion (not something I care about personally, but the masses do and it adds some friction, even if little).

                I may be wrong, maybe adapters have no issue with hdmi to DP, but in the past I have only heard of trouble with adapters just not working for some devices.

                • piccolo@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  12 hours ago

                  Dp to hdmi is very reliable. The siginals are near identical, the adapter is just a level shifter. Not much can go wrong. Issues arise when talking about either cheaply made (out of spec) or active adapters.

                  it makes the product feel less refined/premium/sleek in my opinion

                  Maybe for Apple users.