• partial_accumen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Okay fine. I’ve tried to say this 2 times, but apparently I’m bad at communicating. None of my opinions have changed in my posts, this is what I’ve been trying to say this entire time. I’ll spell out what I meant from the very first post:

    • These drawings don’t look like a photo
    • I had thought to communicate these emotions required being able to draw like a photo
    • I have learned by looking at this comic that drawing these complex emotions does not require drawing like a photo.
    • I have learned by looking at this comic that drawing complex emotions is a different artistic skillset than drawing like a photo
    • The artist is clearly very artistically talented.

    I’m not bashing the artist at all. I’m not saying they are bad at art. I’m not saying their simply drawing style is simple to produce. I’m saying it doesn’t look like a photograph, yet still accomplishes the artists goal of relaying these emotions incredibly effectively.

    • GrantUsEyes@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Got it. I wanted to convey that art can be complex even if it is not photorealistic, and appears simple on the surface. It’s not necessarily simple to produce either, (more so than a fully rendered painting well, yeah) but imo it’s important to aknowledge the skill behind something like this.

      • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        15 hours ago

        but imo it’s important to aknowledge the skill behind something like this.

        From my first post that’s what I’ve been doing. I’m not sure why you’re taking this thread where I have done nothing but compliment the artist and their skills and try to make it sound like I’m insulting the artist instead. Even with your response here you’re doing that again.

        • GrantUsEyes@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          15 hours ago

          I said “got it” in my previous comment to aknowledge that. I’ m not insisting that you aren’t in my past comment. I’m explaining why I felt the need reply the way I did. The way I intrerpteted Initially your wording prompted me to write. Just that

      • SassyRamen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        This user you’re replying to is IMO either a bot, or feeding an Ai’s answers to us via comments.

        • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          This isn’t the first time I’ve been accused of being a bot, nor of using AI. Instead, its the other thing. I’m older. This is just how we talk. Heck, why do you think LLMs talk this way? Because it was trained on people data that talk like I do.

          I don’t really use LLMs or AI for regular tasks like posting online. I grew up with the skills to do that

            • partial_accumen@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Isn’t that convenient! One lesson you learn as you get older is to simple “let people continue to be wrong”. That’s what I’ll do now. You should probably just block me then because I must be AI, right? I think you’ll be doing both of us a favor. Have a great day!