• Warl0k3@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Dude I addressed the blatantly false premise your points were based on instead of the points themselves, because addressing them individually would imply a tacit acceptance of the faulty assertions they’re founded upon.

    • dogbert@lemmy.zipOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I have no idea what you’re talking about. Let me know when you’re ready for an adult conversation.

      • Warl0k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Yeah, I know you don’t. I’ll freely admit it was kinda self-indulgent to try and explain such a basic aspect of debate, and I was just happily dunking on you under the assumption it’d go over your head and you’d play off the superiority complex to try to save some face.

        I notice you haven’t replied to the other commenter which laid out in much clearer terms what I’m saying here, and goes into more details about why you’re full o’ crap - if you’re so interested in an “adult conversation” why haven’t you just gone to engage with them instead?