The GNOME.org Extensions hosting for GNOME Shell extensions will no longer accept new contributions with AI-generated code. A new rule has been added to their review guidelines to forbid AI-generated code.

Due to the growing number of GNOME Shell extensions looking to appear on extensions.gnome.org that were generated using AI, it’s now prohibited. The new rule in their guidelines note that AI-generated code will be explicitly rejected

  • uncouple9831@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    I don’t think this is in response to my message. If that was the intent, I think you need to define what “that” is, which is always the case.

    • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      “why would that be anyone but the original author?”

      That is what i was replying to, and I replied to the intended comment

        • vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          no, the opposite. The problem with ai pull requests is that in most cases whoever submits them does not understand the code and expects someone else to review it for them (that’s if they are even aware of the concept of code reviews in the first place).

          • uncouple9831@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            Who said pull requests? That isn’t the topic of this thread.

            Over and over again this thread’s ai hate brigade seems to want to apply some bad experience you had at work to this completely different scenario. It’s not the same. Sorry, but I have zero interest in being your therapist and you’re not going to convince me by drumming up bad examples.