Our long history of violating international law continues…

  • arrow74@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Right so that has a word. Those individuals would be privateers. They commit state sanctioned piracy.

    If you’re using your country’s military that’s not piracy by any definition

    • Uruanna@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Privateers are private individuals. Not military. They just happened to be paid by a state.

      The only distinction is for Venezuela to make. They won’t handle an act of war the same way as an act of piracy - and they shouldn’t be expected to be responsible for US internal politics, or give a shit.

      • arrow74@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Did you mean to reply to me? I’m pretty sure I made it very clear these were not privateers and was instead the military.

        When I said “They committed state sanctioned piracy” I was replying to a comment asking about historical privateers. “They” refers to those historical privateers not the current situation with the US military being used