brianpeiris@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 19 hours agoNo AI* Here - A Response to Mozilla's Next Chapter - Waterfox Blogwww.waterfox.comexternal-linkmessage-square87fedilinkarrow-up1424cross-posted to: privacy@programming.devprivacy@lemmy.mlfirefox@fedia.io
arrow-up1424external-linkNo AI* Here - A Response to Mozilla's Next Chapter - Waterfox Blogwww.waterfox.combrianpeiris@lemmy.ca to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 19 hours agomessage-square87fedilinkcross-posted to: privacy@programming.devprivacy@lemmy.mlfirefox@fedia.io
minus-squareMac@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·edit-215 hours agoYou’re never going to believe this: i can take an article at face value because it’s not being routed through a slop generator when i read it. Whether or not a source can be believed to be true is not within the scope of this thread.
minus-squareFaceDeer@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up4·15 hours agoRight, you take the article at face value. So exactly as I originally said: you sure are relying on just believing whatever you read without any checking whatsoever.
You’re never going to believe this: i can take an article at face value because it’s not being routed through a slop generator when i read it.
Whether or not a source can be believed to be true is not within the scope of this thread.
Right, you take the article at face value. So exactly as I originally said: