cm0002@no.lastname.nz to Privacy@programming.dev · 22 days agoPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up178file-textcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.ml
arrow-up178external-linkPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comcm0002@no.lastname.nz to Privacy@programming.dev · 22 days agomessage-square6fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.ml
minus-squareMugita Sokio@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15·22 days agoHere’s how it’s supposed to be said, and I just did this earlier on Mastodon: “I have nothing to hide, so you shouldn’t surveil me. You have something to hide, so I should surveil you.”
Here’s how it’s supposed to be said, and I just did this earlier on Mastodon:
“I have nothing to hide, so you shouldn’t surveil me. You have something to hide, so I should surveil you.”