cm0002@no.lastname.nz to Privacy@programming.dev · 13 hours agoPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comexternal-linkmessage-square6fedilinkarrow-up168file-textcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.ml
arrow-up168external-linkPeople with nothing to hide need not be bothered about surveillance, Supreme Court sayswww.thehindu.comcm0002@no.lastname.nz to Privacy@programming.dev · 13 hours agomessage-square6fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: privacy@lemmy.ml
minus-squareMugita Sokio@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·13 hours agoHere’s how it’s supposed to be said, and I just did this earlier on Mastodon: “I have nothing to hide, so you shouldn’t surveil me. You have something to hide, so I should surveil you.”
Here’s how it’s supposed to be said, and I just did this earlier on Mastodon:
“I have nothing to hide, so you shouldn’t surveil me. You have something to hide, so I should surveil you.”