• Fizz@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    6 days ago

    I was also offended by his anti democrat tweet but its a stretch to call him pro trump. There is a medium article going over his politics in the last decade and its pretty much entirely liberal left.

      • andronicus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        6 days ago

        Do you have any other sources beyond this one tweet (the very same one the poster you replied to mentioned)?

        I’m genuinely curious, because I haven’t heard much about him beyond that

            • Fizz@lemmy.nz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              5 days ago

              No. That line of logic falls for me. There are plenty of things we’ve given the benefit of the doubt that we don’t cosign or believe in even hitler. I’m not willing to write someone off as being MAGA because they said a positive thing about Trumps FCC pick. He doesnt need to be MAGA for that tweet to be a bad thing.

              I am willing to lose trust in him for being stupid and thinking Lina Khan was a worse FCC chair when hes suppose to be an expert in this industry.

                • Fizz@lemmy.nz
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  21 hours ago

                  And there is 0 difference or impact regarding our opinion on the proton CEO.

            • Someone8765210932@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 days ago

              It’s almost 2026 and people are still acting as if we don’t already know that you can not give any of them the “benefit of the doubt”.

              • nanoswarm9k@lemmus.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                5 days ago

                No such thing as neutral on a moving train. Holding still is going right. A little jog in place is woke. Running for a better life, is, well… antifascist. (Howard Zinn had a little essay collection?)

            • dev_null@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              5 days ago

              Are all the people who said the Department of War name change was good because it finally reflects reality, also nazis? When the broken clock is right do we have to pretend it’s not or we are nazis?

              • nanoswarm9k@lemmus.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                23 hours ago

                No. That’s a pretty bad example, and very abstract in the face of state-funded kidnappings and the gutting of state servants and service offices.

                You can sit in your toffit until you figure a moral compass out for yourself.

                I know which direction to punch. (up.)

                • dev_null@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  17 hours ago

                  How is this different then? We have a progressive guy who keeps going against conservatives and against big tech, and liked when the broken clock Trump did something good for once and appointed an anti big tech person to head an anti trust division. How is this different from people liking the Department of War name change?

        • Best_Jeanist@discuss.online
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          5 days ago

          Proton’s official Reddit account posted a now-deleted comment stating that “Until corporate Dems are thrown out, the reality is that Republicans remain more likely to tackle Big Tech abuses.”

          Within hours, Proton deleted its response across social media accounts, stating that the post — which started with the words “Here is our official response” — was in fact “removed because it was not actually an official statement.” The reply went on to say: “Our policy is that official accounts cannot be used to express personal political opinions. If it happens by mistake, we correct it as soon as we notice it.”

          https://theintercept.com/2025/01/28/proton-mail-andy-yen-trump-republicans/

          I sure hope someone was fired for that blunder!

          (he wasn’t)