i think that the future generation who’s raised by ai slop made by clankers would end up supporting a future fascist regime in the us.

how do you think this can be solved?

  • DylanMc6 [any, any]@lemmy.mlOPEnglish
    1·
    11 小时前

    1. i’m NOT sure who linked the article in the thread, i forgot. that said, thank you!

    • why did they say ‘virtue signaling’ (a term used by conservatives)
    • do you have any reasons why? can you explain?

    1. let me ask the question simply in different wording: "if ai continues to be used for kids’ media and that leads to future generations NOT telling whether something is ai-generated or NOT, would these generations become more susceptible to supporting authoritarian or totalitarian forms of government (ie: fascism)?

    • “bleep-blorpie” is just a term i made up for ai bots. i thought about using it as a derogatory term against ai bots, but i think “bleep-blorpie” is best as an affectionate term. if i wanna talk about ai bots critically, i’ll just say “ai bots” or “ai chatbots”.
    • can i repost that question in the wording i’ve provided in this comment?
    • do you accept my apology for saying words used against ai chatbots that were unintentionally used as microaggressions?
    1. do you think i should study socialist/communist theory a bit more?
    • Trying2KnowMyse[they@lemmy.ml
      2·
      11 小时前

      They said virtue signaling because it’s the essence of what you’re doing - declaring that you express a set of viewpoints rather than actually demonstrating your belief in them through your words and actions.

      I don’t personally see any reason to start another discussion with slightly different wording.

      I don’t believe you need to apologize to me. If you need some acceptance of your apology, I give it, but I see that acceptance as meaningless, personally.

      You’ve asked many times whether you should study more theory and I don’t think I’ve ever seen any variation in the answers. Perhaps instead of asking whether you should, just do.