• Taleya@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    “<subject> porn” has become shorthand for gratuitous objectification in order to cheaply moralise and has been for a while (eg “inspiration porn”).

    They’re being a monumental arsehole about it, but they do have a point - this comic isn’t trying to change the system, or even point it out - it’s a cheap shot designed to make you feel satisfied in recogbising how screwed up things are.

    A comic that would have been very different with the exact same images but a “remember that your child’s Christmas joy may come from exploited children elsewhere” and a suggestion to shop local, or even linking to ethical shopping guides and apps, international groups advocating worker and / or children’s rights would do a thousandfold more than the comic as it stands. Which like the subject matter it claims to decry is cheap, nasty and exploitative.

    Basically: this comic as it stands is doing the exact same thing it’s “condemning”. Using exploited children as fodder to serve.

    • Maxxie@piefed.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 hour ago

      this comic isn’t trying to change the system, or even point it out - it’s a cheap shot designed to make you feel satisfied in recogbising how screwed up things are.

      I’m not sure how you got that and how is this satisfying to anyone, its clearly pointing it out how the system is fucked up.

      And a bunch of action links under the comic would be nice, though I’m sure after looking at it you remembered on your own you’ve yet to donate/phone a congressmen/send some anthrax this season. Takes all kinds 🌠