I had no idea. oO

This was a NSFW, darkly-hilarious webcomic that started ages ago (1999) and ended a few years later… or so I’d thought for years. But no, it seems artist “Clay” has recently relaunched the sucker!

https://www.sexylosers.com/

It’s pretty much in the “OGLAF” class of webcomics, but maybe a little more wicked and subtle.

  • JohnnyEnzyme@piefed.socialOPEnglish
    7·
    5 days ago

    True.
    But I think for this area of NSFW comics, I like seeing woman have the upperhand roughly in proportion to how male-centric most similar comics are. (not to mention hentai, dear god)

    I hate the idea of a society that doesn’t value women well, reduces them to objects, silences their voices, etc…

    • _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.socialEnglish
      12·
      5 days ago

      Hi👋 I am a woman. I believe it’s adorable that this partner is willing to go through the initial embarrassment of calling a public radio to fuck me in ways that make pass out in ecstasy.
      Now, fetch me my strapon, I got to show you a spot males miss in anatomy class.

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        3·
        4 days ago

        Of course this is a satirical web comic, but if we take this seriosly, there’s only two ways this situation could happen:

        • Communication so extremely broken in this relationship that it’s easier for him to get the information he needs by calling a public radio broadcast.
        • She too has no clue at all about sex and thus can’t even tell him what she likes. (This is actually more common in women than one might think.)

        In any way, piling on him for going to extreme lengths trying to learn how to satisfy her is not the problem in that relationship.

        Instead, this comic plays into some real-life double standards that I really don’t like:

        • Sexual prowess is something that men are required to have and it’s shameful if they don’t have that skill. Sexual prowess is something that women don’t need to have and it can be seen as suspect if they do have that skill.
        • Sex is something that men do to women while the only part that women need to play during sex is be in the room and play starfish.
        • Men need to know what this specific woman likes without her communicating that at all.
        • What he likes doesn’t play into the situation at all. If he wants some pleasure out of sex, he needs to do it himself.

        Try gender swapping the comic and there is no joke any more.

          • squaresinger@lemmy.world
            2·
            4 days ago

            What’s wrong with you? I did reply to you to expound on your point because it fit well there.

            Do you always attack people who have a similar opinion than yourself?

            • _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.socialEnglish
              1·
              4 days ago

              What part of pansexualism do you not comprehend?
              I disagree with you completely, and never did I make my statements 🧵 heteronormitive.
              Now get me clamps, let’s make your areolas extra sensitive.

              • squaresinger@lemmy.world
                3·
                4 days ago

                What part of the existence of other people than you don’t you comprehend? Also, what does pansexuality have to do with anything? You can also be a pansexual starfish.

                Pansexuality also doesn’t excuse poor behavior and anger management issues.

                • _‌_反いじめ戦隊@ani.socialEnglish
                  1·
                  4 days ago

                  Oh, I get it now, you don’t know women can love women, femboys, bara, bears, lions, dragons, slimes, tentacles, etc…

                  Hey cisfuck, why can’t I have a nonbinary tentacle monster as a partner? Yeah, I know I can date a sentient starfish. Do you?

                  • squaresinger@lemmy.world
                    2·
                    4 days ago

                    You know, it’s totally fine to have LGBTQ+ only spaces and demand that these spaces stay exclusively LGBTQ+.

                    It’s really weird though to butt into a thread that’s specifically about heterosexual relationships and then demand that everything there is LGBTQ+.

                    It’s about as tone-deaf and inappropriate as if someone would join a queer community and then call everyone slurs for talking about LGBTQ+ relationships.

                    Your choice of relationship is of course of, but offtopic here.

                    Please stay respectful. You want respect for your pansexuality, please be respectful of other people’s lifestyle choices. Don’t be a bigot.