• Deceptichum@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Because there are mistakes anywhere. Wikipedia gives you the tools to easily verify what you’re reading.

    • Zorcron@piefed.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Okay, so you’re saying that although the editor made a mistake or was biased, but unlike a lot of other resources, they have to show their sources, so if you care to look, you can see if it is true?

      If so, I think that makes sense.

      • Deceptichum@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Pretty much.

        Theres also resources such as revision histories that add an extra layer of information that you can’t find in other information sources.

        It’s not perfect, but it’s the best around.