• plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    Ah yes, use an unknown potentially inferior product and lose your customers from the lack of quality and consistency.

    There’s a reason they use single procurement, consistency.

    • Smuuthbrane@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 days ago

      If you panic and just buy anything as a replacement, you’re doing it wrong. You’d vet another source the same way you’d vet your regular supplier. It’s just being prepared as opposed to panicking.

          • plantfanatic@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            The contingency is not serve the products instead of producing sub par and different food in the mean time.

            The replacement wouldn’t be the same dude, that’s the entire issue to being with and why they would never even entertain the idea to begin with. It’s gonna taste different. Full stop.

            They know it’s an option, it’s just the worst one. You don’t seriously think you came up with some novel idea they haven’t mulled over before have you?