• Nima@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    4 months ago

    he hasn’t gone out of his way. he just thinks its irrelevant to make a report about it. and he is correct. thats not what github report is for.

    these commenters are hitting this guy for something so small it’s not worth getting angry over.

    they’re calling this guy a transphobe for saying “please take this somewhere else. this is not the appropriate place” nothing about that is malicious or transphobic. at all.

    • jack@monero.town
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yup, the other side is pretty counterproductive with saying the project is dehumanizing etc. They’re absurdly exaggerating.

      It wasn’t just a report tho, it’s a PR that could’ve been merged with a single click

      • Nima@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 months ago

        I hope this guy has himself a nice whiskey and a break. and I hope the commenters find some other fixation soon.

      • Axusse@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        I agree with that, I read the comments and I agree about exaggeration. At the same time it is not something political to just adjust the documentation to use gender neutral terms as it is a professional thing to do. Where would be the place to discuss it considering that the only way to modify the code is from GitHub and PR?

    • Kiwi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      They didn’t make a “report”, I think the word you’re looking for is “issue”. What they did was open a “pull request” that got rejected. So more of a “hey I made a small change to make everything more inclusive that will not affect you in any way” and the dev said “please don’t be political here”.

      The person suggesting the change wasn’t being political but the dev was by rejecting the change

    • iltg@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      4 months ago

      “us/them” mentality doesn’t help much. this is surely a great fuss for a 3 year old pr but you’re misrepresenting the situation:

      • serenityOS (and consequently ladybird) has rather strict rules about wording documentation: they enforce language style and even date formats
      • that wasn’t a report, but a PR: rather than pressing ~50 keys on your keyboard and then a “lock” button he could have just pressed the “merge” button and integrated those ~10 total characters changes
      • github issues are routinely used to fix wording: documentation often lives on git and it’s useful to have it version controlled, even plain documents without attached source are kept on git so that their edit history is accessible and manageable

      folks are making a big fuss but Andreas really set himself up: just say sorry and change 4 words, such a weird horse to die on