Following https://tarte.nuage-libre.fr/c/fediverse/p/194717/we-need-more-users I decided to explore data a little bit more. I’m not the biggest fan of growth-as-as-target so I wanted to see how much the people were participating in the discussion.

The data

I took the data from the API explorer in https://api.fediverse.observer/ with this query:

query {  
  monthlystats {  
    date_checked  
    softwarename  
    total_posts  
    total_users  
    total_comments  
  }  
}  

Then parsed the json with this https://jqlang.org/ filter:

jq '.data.monthlystats | map(select(.total_users > 0 and (.softwarename == "lemmy" or .softwarename == "mbin" or .softwarename == "kbin" or .softwarename == "piefed"))) | group_by(.date_checked) | map( {date_checked: .[0].date_checked, total_users: ([.[] | .total_users] | add), total_posts: ([.[] | .total_posts] | add), total_comments: ([.[] | .total_comments] | add)}) | map({date_checked, posts: .total_posts/.total_users, comments: .total_comments/.total_users}) | sort_by(.date_checked) | map([.date_checked, (.posts | tostring), (.comments | tostring)]) | .[] | @csv'  

(As you see I filtered for the threadiverse. I also did the same with all software, I’ll put the graph for that in comments)

Then did a good old’ chart

What to think of it

I don’t know. Users’ activity is on the rise and I find it nice

  • cron@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    One thing that annoys me about each statistic about posts is that I don’t know how many of these posts are actually interesting and engaged with.

    For example, there is a specific instance that just mirrors reddit content and has barely any engagement. The bot posts mulitple posts per hour, mostly without any comments or upvotes.

    It seems rather irrelevant to compare these posts to actually interesting posts with a nice discussion and a couple of upvotes.

    My suggestion would be to count and plot the number of posts that have at least a few interactions.

    • OpenStars@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 hours ago

      PieFed labels bots and bot-like accounts, allowing you to choose options like blur or show the content semi-transparently.

      • cron@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 hours ago

        I‘m not worried about myself. It’s easy enough to block stuff I don’t like. All I wanted to say is that counting daily posts without excluding bots doesn’t make much sense to me.

        • OpenStars@piefed.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          The issue does get murky - especially when people use the same account both for their bot posting and also for their human interactions, rather than separating the two.