• bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Thats not their model, and that model also sucks ass for supporting other humans.

    I am one of those weirdos who likes to own my media. There are few of us geezers left, but luckily enough that bandcamp exists.

    • blitzen@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Just because the Spotify model sucks doesn’t mean it has to.

      I don’t see a reason why 85% of a monthly subscription couldn’t given directly to the artists you actually listen to, and any albums your purchase is on the platform (and you get to keep the drm-free files).

      Honestly it kinda sounds like an awesome service.

      Edit: I’m one of those geezers too, who prefers to own my music. I just think there’s room for both.

      • huppakee@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 minutes ago

        The Spotify model sucks despite throwing money at it for years, so my guess is they surely can give you some reasons why 85% of your monthly subscription can’t be given to the artists you listen to.