cm0002@infosec.pub to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 11 hours agoClosing programsinfosec.pubimagemessage-square66fedilinkarrow-up1378
arrow-up1378imageClosing programsinfosec.pubcm0002@infosec.pub to Programmer Humor@programming.dev · 11 hours agomessage-square66fedilink
minus-squareAllero@lemmy.todaylinkfedilinkarrow-up1·edit-22 hours agoHonestly, yes. Linux lacks a native Task manager, and this is one of the “death by a thousand cuts” roadblocks that prevent its adoption. A user must be able to launch a graphical tool to manage processes even if everything else froze. That’s just basic usability. Can it be currently resolved with a terminal? Yes. Should it be resolved with a terminal? No.
Honestly, yes.
Linux lacks a native Task manager, and this is one of the “death by a thousand cuts” roadblocks that prevent its adoption.
A user must be able to launch a graphical tool to manage processes even if everything else froze. That’s just basic usability.
Can it be currently resolved with a terminal? Yes. Should it be resolved with a terminal? No.