• dogbert@lemmy.zipOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    12 hours ago

    You say “collapsing”, yet America has always been this way. The poor have never been taken care of, and the homeless are used as a reminder for the poor. There is no incentive to fix these problems, even when America thrives.

    My point isnt that China is “good”. Defining a nation by terms like good or bad is useless. Countries are defined by who they serve, and China serves its people, for better or worse.

    Norway and Sweden are not socialist countries, they are social democracies. They both have the term “social” but mean very different things. Norway and Sweden are still capitalist nations. Norway has considerable wealth inequality, while Sweden’s is growing as well. In a social democracy, instead of the workers at home being squeezed dry, the exploitation is exported to the global south. Citizens of Norway and Sweden may live in comfort, but it comes at the cost of black and brown bodies you may have less sympathy for. The goal should be to end worker exploitation, not export it.

    Here is a great video debunking the Tiananmen Square narrative. The original upload was removed by your authoritarian US empire. Ironic…

    https://youtu.be/Oo6cs0_URL0

    • Pajonk@szmer.info
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Nope, after the war, when USA had very high corporate tax and very high state investment in science and middle class, American dream was a thing. Then in the 70’ the switch to neoliberalism, middle class start getting poorer.

      China serves its people, for better or worse.

      Of course not. As long as you have rulling class and they have all the power, state is serving them. You can call them kings, oligarchs, party, priests, pope, tzars, and so on. But the problem is the same. State is serving the rulling class.

      Like USA after the war. USA was afraid of socialist revolution, so rulling class decided to stop it by creating middle class, supporting poor people and so on.

      In Europe this approach was done for so long that we almost forget what are oligarchs. It was a shame to have bilions and openly control Media or politics. Because we saw what’s goin on in the Russia after Soviet collapse.

      Norway and Sweden are not socialist countries, they are social democracies.

      Still social democracy is way better and way more socialist than state capitalism.

      The goal should be to end worker exploitation, not export it.

      So we agree, and now you don’t like china? Working conditions in china are way worst than in Norway. Finally we’re agreeing on something.

      • Soot [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 hours ago

        There’s a very good novel called Grapes of Wrath by John Steinbeck, set ~1940, if you’ve not heard of it. It’s a long read, but the gist is - The American dream was not a thing, it was just that, a dream. Of Mice and Men had a similar theme.

        People in America have been ever more under the thumb of the capitalist machine, which has always been extremely wasteful and punitive on the working class, even high corporate tax and state investment didn’t fix the issue, just ameliorated it a bit for some - neoliberalism is just another expression of the same fundamental problem.

        And, as a European, oligarchs are a very prominent part of the ruling class, we’re just like, 95% ruled by rich people as opposed to America’s 98%. I’m a little shocked to hear you claim otherwise.

        • Pajonk@szmer.info
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          People in America have been ever more under the thumb of the capitalist machine, which has always been extremely wasteful and punitive on the working class, even high corporate tax and state investment didn’t fix the issue, just ameliorated it a bit for some - neoliberalism is just another expression of the same fundamental problem.

          I fully agree. But life after the war, before neoliberalism was still better than after it was introduced. Neoliberalism is just a capitalism on a steroids.

          I’m a little shocked to hear you claim otherwise.

          Where did i stated that?

          In the world we have countries where oligarchs are openly ruling the country, in europe years ago it was a little bit secret that this is going on, and people were pretending that democracy works. Nowadays, thanks to USA and Russia oligarchs, It’s kinda cool to be oligarchs. And that’s sad.