• NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    2 days ago

    What a inefficient use of land, let alone what’s being built on it.

    Honestly I would probably prefer data centers built in old open pit mines before the mine gets filled back in.

    Or maybe build them in Alaska for example where it’s cold, or space like a halo?

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      before the mine gets filled back in.

      That has to be prevented from happening, and those mines have pumps in them. Otherwise land around gets poisoned (and also eroded).

      So putting useful objects inside those mines at least makes them not just passive expense.

      If someone wants to know what if you just don’t pump the water out of an unused mine, leaving it be, then they can read what happens in Donbass now that nobody takes care of those many depleted mines there, due to war. It’s like Mordor basically.

      • wolframhydroxide@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Since the person above didn’t actually give enough information for someone to understand:

        Look up “Acid Mine Drainage”. Its when sulfide minerals react with water and oxygen to produce sukfuric acid, and it occurs in pretty much every mine once it’s opened, and continues to accrue and leak for thousands of years. Ancient Roman mines are still leaking the toxic, acidic sludge today, and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future.

    • vinyl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s cheap to build on that land and labor is cheap and less legal fight against the company if some fuckup happens